Sunday 27 April 2008

Poll.

'The population explosion is far more feared than a nuclear explosion?'

Population Explosion
 
 2

A Nuclear Explosion
 
 6


7 comments:

  1. nuclear. c'mon. that's no contest.

    ReplyDelete
  2. a nuclear blast hurts only a country. but population implosion harms the world in the long run, strippin off more resources, increase poverty and damage the environment...

    ReplyDelete
  3. i'll choose death over population explosion.

    ReplyDelete
  4. yeah but the whole question hinges on the words "most feared" meaning opinion on public perception as a whole - and "Nuclear" is the average man's automatic reaction. it may not be the correct or educated answer, but it's definitely the instinctive one.

    but the answer may differ if you phrase it this way: "Which would you rather suffer: nuclear explosion or population explosion?" i think most people would personally choose a quick death.. i think..

    ReplyDelete
  5. true. heh! nevertheless. i still feared a population explosion rather then a nuclear one.

    ReplyDelete
  6. hmmm... how about the after effects of nuclear explosion?
    radioactivity... deformed babes... the permanent shadows on the pavements of Hiroshima haunts me...
    depending on the magnitude... it could kill alot of people during the explosion and many more will die from poisoning after that... it's neither a pretty sight nor thought...

    ReplyDelete